AND
IT IS NOT SOMETHING THAT IS EXCLUSIVE… BUT WE JUST THINK THAT IT IS
There
were two boxers from Mexico years ago who had a super-intense rivalry. They fought each other three times with both
fighters splitting the first two and now the third fight was approaching. The cliché, “these two guys really don't like
each other” was apt, as these two guys did not like each other and fought like
it. In fact, the resemblance to
Ali-Frazier rivalry was an equally appropriate comparison, as many of the
insult they hurled between each other were not only personal, but on a level
that those who were outside of their loop of cultural identification and
ethnicity could not adequately understand the hatred these two men had for each
other.
African-American’s
tend to believe that the experience we have had in America is unique in the
sense that no one, not even President Bill Clinton, can feel our collective
pain. Never have I understood the logic…
individually, no, I do not think that you can “feel my pain” just as I cannot
feel yours. But it is when it is seen
through the macro-perspective, that any sentient being can grasp the pain and
injustice that African-Americans have had to endure in America. But, we are not the only ones who have had to
put up with the social injustices and the internecine social
contradictions within or ethnic group.
So listening to these two Mexican fighters hurl “yo’ Momma-level”
insults at one another, I knew that not only was it personal, but their beef
was at a fundamental level of ethnic identity.
In Mexico, there apparently is a slur that indicates you are
“a field n*gger”, and the word used here was “Indian”. You could tell that it was meant to be
indicative of a lack of sophistication, understanding and class. The other fighter was a college graduate and family
was renowned in
Mexico City, and considered to be a “white Mexican”, and a part of the upwardly
mobile class. But I think that it would
be difficult if not impossible, particularly with a brother (or sister) around my age and older, to understand that
we are not the only one who “split hairs” amongst ourselves, picking between
variations that are only of significance to “us”. There was a lot of “house n*gger, field
n*gger” in the rivalry between Ali and Frazier, and I have always been a
“Frazier guy”, because I understood where his frustration came from. The excellent HBO documentary “One NationDivisible” does a great job in capturing the frustration that Joe Frazierfelt, as the "darky" to Muhmmad Ali's more "true" representation of blackness. And just as it is with so many
things promoted to purport one way of thinking, middle-class Muhammad Ali’s
experience was less common than that of Smokin’ Joe’s. If you were to have measured which one of the
two had the more “authentic” black experience, the case is there for Smokin’
Joe to lay claim to that title. But
history tells a different story and while I have all the respect for the
greatness of Ali and his amazing legacy, the injustice done to Joe Frazier is
one that occurs all too-often.
The
Mexican fighters and their fierce dislike for one another confirmed something
that I had suspected … that other ethnic groups had their own “Willie Lynch Legends”
to account for. Colorism is not
something that we, as African-Americans, own exclusively. The reason we are not as aware of them as we
are of the other myths that exists about each other is that these are things
that reside within the family, and that for African-Americans, it was used as
pretext to justify the system of white supremacy here in the United States. For many sisters and brothers, there is no
reason to discuss the significance of characteristics that are so second
natures that one is not even paying any attention to it… slipping in and out of
a role as easily as a Texas native who has spent their adult life in New York
quickly falls back into their drawl. And
if they don’t, the kind of cynicism they avail themselves is similar to the
incredulity of the cowboys in the Pace Salsa commercial when they learn the
stuff they are using was made in New York City.
This dichotomy mostly goes unaddressed within a community, especially
when it reveals something inconvenient about the group.
Joe
Frazier’s dislike for Muhammad Ali is rooted in something far, far deeper than
sports. Frazier would have fought Ali as
hard as he did FOR FREE if Ali had said some of the same things he did to his
face AND after he helped him on his feet?
No, this was not about the money or even being a World Champion for Joe
Frazier… it was for something that meant far more than just material trinkets
and supposed public prestige and riches.
It was about what defined him as a human being and THAT is why he pushed
himself to fight Ali to inner reaches of human endurance. Now that we have taken over the perpetual
suppression of African-Americans and their cultural representation in America,
we can hate ourselves just fine, thank you very much. Not only that, just look at how we tear and
rend each other’s flesh… no problem, from the nihilism of music to our
inconsistent social order, we will be just fine down here in the dregs of
society… oops, there is another ethnic group passing us in political and social
influence now! Never mind, we will
consume and provide markets for the global corporations from now until the end
times really do arrive!!
One
of the things about my ramblings, and I feel that I have been repeating this
too often (an insecurity, perhaps??) is that I
never claimed that this was an exercise in intellectual, academic
discussion. What goes on here is merely
the first draft of something that has to be strained and boiled down before it
becomes “policy”. And even with things
that are policy and discussed here, it is still open for amending. And yet, when it comes to frankly discussing
racial dynamics, and more importantly, INTRA-racial dynamics, African-Americans
tend to close ranks, which would be alright IF as a group, it was to question
and consider an issue. Instead, or so it
seems to me, ranks are closed in the same way any dysfunctional group or
organization closes ranks (since there was a big story about the Boy Scouts on
the radio, we will use them as example) only to protect itself and perceived image,
often at the expense of those who either suffer and /or are victims due to institutional
neglect. F*ck that.
The
only reason I cannot say that I have never given a sh*t about what “black
people” think of me is that I might have had a glimmer of a thought when I was
a pre-schooler. For sure when I got
called either “yellow” or “white boy” by a darker hued kid, especially post “Roots”,
I gave less a f*ck about what a supposedly “sister” or “brother” called me or
referenced me in accordance to what they observed about my skin tone. If only for the want of an “F-bomb” as a
child! Anywho, the women who feel that
my opinions on African-American relationships are somehow invalid because I am
now involved with a white woman are simply misguided and closed minded.
First
of all, African-Americans are the WORST kind of “colorists” that there are. Those who are darker, and seem to project the
“pro-black agenda” also seem to be the ones who are among the first to “switch”
rather than “fight”. Ain’t that right
Kanye? And I still have not gotten it
straight with Michael Jackson (r.i.p), whom
conveniently (least to me) developed rosacea when
it was alledged that he went in for skin lightening treatments, to say nothing
of the “family package” that the Jackson got in plastic surgery…
But
see, that is alright. Just as it is
alright with any number of situations and conditions where the definition for “blackness”
is conveniently massaged and altered, so that it can include the parts of
someone that is celebrated and ignore the “less-than-good” about them.
Colorism
in the African-American community reinforces and internalizes the old Jim Crow
rules about segregation, but it comes with a bitter twist. Because it is from the
side that I feel that I am standing on, the surprise of the kind of “friendly
fire” I have been receiving lately is what makes it seem worse. “I have met the enemy and it is us,” could
have been Pogo talking about the African-American community, but I think I have
rambled on long enough about that. What
I hoped to illustrate was the pointlessness and contradiction of
African-Americans wanting to dissolve the prejudices held against the group,
but alternatively still reinforcing an internal segregation, projecting it
outward in a Bizzaro-style ideation that would allow us the social mobility in
society while maintaining a “racial integrity”, where we only mated and loved
other AA’s.
AND WHY THERE IS NO “TACTICAL”?
Because
it is going to be a part of my wrap-up of this particular thought trend. This has been a long week, and for me,
dealing with what is at the heart of this for me, whether “Miss What’s
Happening” happens to be white (as Princess is) or African-American is actually
among the secondary factors in determining who I would want to be with.
1 comment:
Sucks that you even need to have to try an explain any of this...
Post a Comment